First, Rebel Against Yourself.

Nature & the Environment, Politics & Public Debate

In Owen Jones’ recent interview video with Extinction Rebellion, Roger Hallam criticises the political ‘left’ as having been perpetually dishonest about what economic action is required to mitigate the climate breakdown and what cultural changes this will necessitate. He contends that the ‘left’ have become so embroiled, so entrenched in the (conceptually politically right-wing) neoliberal ideal they are unable to conceive of human life “in anything other than cost-benefit, materialistic terms”. Their proposed resolutions have therefore assumed that market forces are enough to tackle climate change: business as usual WILL work, it just needs tweaking! They were wrong, whilst Roger is correct: The ‘left’ – the supposed political guardians of justice and equality – have fundamentally failed to realise that at the very heart of any suitable action to mitigating the climate breakdown requires a redefinition and restructuring of our society and economy. Just like all life on this planet, justice and equality depend upon this for their survival.

It can feel as though we need to go through our very own personal extinction in order to prevent a global one.

So, the political ‘left’ need to become Left again. For many of us, this has long been clear to see. Thankfully, it appears that they’re (just) starting to see the light. But we, and they, need to be clear about what the necessary changes in our society will require of us culturally and personally. Roger was unequivocal about this. It requires us to accept, moreover embrace, lower standards of living. For freeing ourselves from our capitalist indoctrination involves repudiating everything tied up in capitalism’s tautological relationship with growth. So we must retract from our supposed inter-generational contract with every consecutive generation to give them a better standard of living than the previous (I say ‘supposed’ because I’ve never seen nor signed this thing). It’s a faulty contract, the objectives of which cannot be sustained by virtue of its very design. We pursue its fulfilment in vain, and at what price? At best, the end of civil society, justice and equality; at worst, the end of human existence altogether.

Therefore, we need to redefine ourselves, every one of us; we need to change our expectations of what life entails. Reducing our standard of living involves changing a whole host of our own personal life-defining ideas. We need to be willing to fully extend the service life of everything we own, instead of repeatedly repurchasing unnecessary replacements. We need to re-skill ourselves so as not to be reliant on corporate manufacturers. We need to be canny, creative and imaginative. And we can be! We must reuse, recycle, repair and adapt our clothes again and again and again, until they are literally unusable as objects of clothing; and then up-cycle them into rags and quilts. We must re-green and re-wild our concreted areas, reconnect with the wilderness, walk upon, re-learn, appreciate and cultivate our privately owned microcosmic lands. We must localise ourselves (without vulgarising ourselves into xenophobes), so that we can walk, push or cycle ourselves to work, the grocer, to our friends and families. Concede that animal husbandry is one of the greatest causes of environmental degradation, and thus accept that meat ought to be reserved for special occasions, or better yet not be consumed at all. Accept that we needn’t pollute our drains with noxious chemicals when we wash ourselves and our possessions; realise that we needn’t shower every single day in order to be sanitary.

And this needn’t amount to austerity as we currently understand it – as a degrading, unrelenting existence at the margins of civilisation, wherein nothing possesses beauty or meaning. Kings and queens of empires old had austere lives compared to many of us. Ingenuity in practical utility can be appreciated in aesthetic terms. Yes, the story, the history and destiny, and the scars of our possessions can cause us to marvel over them, giving them aesthetic merit. Further still, in the process of changing ourselves, our conceptions of objective perfection will entirely evaporate, but the ‘civil’ part our civilisation will not. THAT is what we are doing this for. There is meaning in all this. So, don’t mistake reduced ‘living standards’ for reduced ‘quality of life.’ They are very different things. Happiness and contentment are in this imagined society, and can wholly be found in the process of transitioning to it.

I’ve said it before: the changes required will not be easy. We will all experience some strife in the process of challenging and changing ourselves. I’ve experienced it myself, and last week I met many people at the Extinction Rebellion protests in London that had, are or were beginning to experience their own internal mental rebellions: I am not you anymore, I am someone else; I wish there was another way but there isn’t, so leave me be! This internal, somewhat subconscious self-rejection is relentlessly tiring because redefining ourselves, re-finding ourselves is a tortuous task. There is no physicality to this kind of lost-ness; we are truly alone in an ethereally grievous mental-state. Those who’ve experienced it may now know very little about who they are, but they have realised that our self-image is inextricably bound up in our culture, and that culture has been hogtied by a now rotting politico-economic system. For us, denouncing this system is like pronouncing in the 19th century that “God is dead”. It can feel as though we are left in possession of nothing, yet still have everything to lose. It can feel as though we need to go through our very own personal extinction in order to prevent a global one.

Yet there is something that keeps us going. There is hope. There is solidarity and love. More importantly, there is a new social contract to draw up, and quickly. Its objectives may just about be attainable, if we really try; if we continue to rebel. This contract won’t catalyse injustice, inequality and global extinction. No, neither will this contract aspire to give our future generations a better standard of living. Instead, it will aspire to give them life. No luxuries. Just food to eat and air to breathe. In essence, that’s all Extinction Rebellion are asking for: that we allow our children to live.  

We rebel for life. Viva la Rebellion.

A.C. Stark

This article was recently posted on the Extinction Rebellion blog, XRblog.

17 thoughts on “First, Rebel Against Yourself.

  1. Another great post, A.C.
    Roger Hallam’s criticism of the ‘left’ rightly says that it is neoliberal in its prescriptions for change, so is there any difference between the ‘left’ and the ‘right’ in regard to these basic illusions? Certainly there have been and are still significant differences between left and right, but little difference in regards to the illusions described, apparently.
    I agree and would further suggest that there is a significant degree of understanding, though perhaps still vaguely expressed, across politics in our time that fundamental change is necessary. It is not ignorance which has led to our new state of Post Truth, rather knowledge. The breadth and depth of the fundamental change you describe would be terrifying to many, hence a sensed, if sometimes unconscious, need to create denial in the face of that knowledge. But what’s at stake goes deeper than that.
    Anthropologists (e.g. Jared Diamond) have suggested there is evidence that many cultures of the past have encountered such existential moments – starkly put: which is more important, to change and survive as a civilization, even thrive, or is it more important to hold onto to the traditional view of itself (‘world view’) with attendant practices, even if it means extinction of their civilization.
    What is happening across consumer civilizations today is this cultural existential process of deciding priorities. It may be the Post Truth Era is a precursor to a more conscious cultural decision that the change is too much, thus allowing our exploitative culture to continue with the future playing itself out, likely not ending well. But a more hopeful way is still possible as you suggest.

    Liked by 1 person

  2. This is absolutely what’s required, but I’m not sure there will be a wave of rebellion from previous generations because we’ve been so acclimated to what we’re doing. However, I agree completely that this is what it will take to preserve what’s left of this planet.

    Liked by 1 person

  3. This is so well written and a wake up call! Thank you so much for penning this one! Indeed we are so driven by everything that the markets have to offer, never estimating do I need this? Will my life stop were I not to have this? Hoarding away we are depleting the resources that earth has to offer, killing our very own existence. We must learn to reuse, recycle! There is so much joy in doing so. Thank you again for this post.

    Liked by 1 person

  4. I totally agree. We have to change how we operate and stop consuming. It is not necessary to won the latests gadgets or air travel all over the globe. Fossil fuel must be eliminated and all good recycled. Most of the current politicians are supportive. We have to change that too.

    Liked by 1 person

  5. I’ve decided to ‘follow’ this blog because this one article says the very things I’ve been saying since the sixties when I awoke to the fact that I needed to be an environmentalist, a choice that meant change even then when my own life was still austere by the standards of those around me. It was obvious to me then that Earth was a closed system that could not sustain unlimited growth. 50 years later how true that is proving to be and yet how few of the billions feeding off the planet understand this part of the law of thermodynamics. Anthropological climate change is entropic. I have a test for anyone who would claim to care and to be a rebel, a very easy one: boycott everything “Amazon” and let the people know you are doing it. “Amazon” represents everything that the climate change conscientious objector stands against. So, step #1…

    Liked by 2 people

  6. Friend, I am so glad I found your blog. This is the kind of reminder I need. I taught environmental ethics last semester, and while I knew most of the information I taught and have been adjusting my life over the years, it was a reminder (once again) of the changes I need to make to love the earth in word and practice. Your posts reminds me of this again. I loved this line: “We need to be canny, creative and imaginative.” Cheers!

    Liked by 2 people

  7. Well said, A.C.!
    The lifestyle changes required for the transition to a more sustainable economy will be felt most severely among populations that enjoy the capitalist’s ideal of a high standard of living. The poor, meanwhile, are already being hit the hardest by the fallout of climate disruption and ecological collapse.

    Liked by 2 people

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s